tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6833372664905554734.post7644314439589339662..comments2024-03-23T03:41:27.086+08:00Comments on Corporate Governance in Malaysia: News October 27, 2011M.A. Windhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16833927103193297126noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6833372664905554734.post-85719724537845446532011-10-27T11:18:26.561+08:002011-10-27T11:18:26.561+08:00Correct, but they have the fiduciary duty to act i...Correct, but they have the fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the company. I think they have to prove that, show they did their best to get the best possible deal for all of the shareholders.M.A. Windhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16833927103193297126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6833372664905554734.post-49777245858178938312011-10-27T11:06:23.905+08:002011-10-27T11:06:23.905+08:00In the case of APLAND, if the Board fights for bet...In the case of APLAND, if the Board fights for better offer, it means the major shareholders who hold the positions of Executive Chairman, Joint Managing Directors in APLAND have to folk out more in this related party transactionAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com