From The Edge, Sep 8, 2011:
The proposed privatisation of Pan Malaysian Industries Bhd (PMI) could help Tan Sri Khoo Kay Peng to consolidate his interests in Malayan United Industries Bhd (MUI). PMI holds a 10.27% stake in MUI.
PMI first announced to Bursa Malaysia on Aug 26 that it had received a takeover offer from a consortium of three companies to acquire the remaining 558 million shares or 44.17% stake they do not own in PMI at an offer price of 4.5 sen per share.
The consortium comprises Soo Lay Holdings Sdn Bhd with 8.6% equity interest, Hong Kong-based Norcoss Ltd (27.48%) and Cherubim Investment (HK) Ltd (CIL-19.69%) in PMI. Khoo is the controlling shareholder of all three companies.
PMI said the joint offerors plan to delist PMI if it is unable to comply with the shareholding spread requirement. The takeover offer needs the approval of the Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia.
Following the announcement, CIL increased its stake further in PMI by 0.8%, purchasing a total of 7.65 million shares on Aug 29, Sept 2 and Sept 5.
Still, an analyst said the offer price of 4.5 sen is low compared with the standard 30% premium for takeover exercises in the past. PMI was trading at 4.5 sen when the offer was made on Aug 26. Since then, PMI has fallen as low as 3.5 sen before closing at 4.5 sen yesterday.
“It is also important to note that the counter has risen as high as seven sen early this year,” said the analyst, adding that the deal could be foiled as investors could hold onto the shares and force the consortium to offer a higher price.
The proposed privatisation of PMI is seen as a move by Khoo to gain a bigger controlling stake in MUI, in which PMI holds a 10.27% stake. Should the privatisation succeed, Khoo would increase his indirect shareholding in MUI from 49.93% currently to 55.23%.
“Apart from that, there is little reason for Khoo to take PMI private. PMI has been a loss-making company for many years and it does not have many assets besides Menara PMI,” he said.
PMI has been making losses since FY06. For FY11 ended March 31, it posted a net loss of RM300,000 on the back of RM4.7 million in revenue. As at June 30, it had RM131.52 million in borrowings while cash stood at only RM608,000. Its net assets stood at RM179.35 million or 2.12 sen per share.
At 4.5 sen per share, Khoo would need to pay approximately RM25.1 million to obtain the remaining shares of PMI. That is a small price to pay to consolidate his interests in MUI, where most of his assets are placed.
MUI has businesses in retailing, hotel, food and confectionery, financial investments and travel services. It owns retailers Metrojaya Bhd and Laura Ashley Holdings plc, which is listed on the London Stock Exchange.
MUI posted RM811,000 in net profit for 1HFY11 ended June 30 on the back of RM443.26 million in revenue, while net assets per share stood at 32.68 sen.
Valuation is one aspect of this deal, control of MUI another. I think there is more to this deal than mentioned in the above article. Let's see how this deal will work out, and what the Authorities will do about it.
http://cgmalaysia.blogspot.com/2011/09/pmi-serious-corporate-governance-issues.html
The latest annual report (FYE 31 March 2011) of PMI shown PMI holding 19.12% in MUI. Why was it suddenly reduced to 10% plus as reported in The Edge?
ReplyDeleteTo privatise PMI will cost Tan Sri Khoo about RM25 million (558 million not already owned by him x RM0.045 per share). For the MUI stake (let's say it is still 19.12%), it will work out about RM0.06 sen per piece for MUI share. If i am Tan Sri Khoo, sure i'll do the same. It's so cheap at RM0.06 compared to current closing price of above RM0.20.
Of course the above have not taken into consideration of RM120 plus borrowing in PMI. IF that have been included, then Tan Sri is paying more to acquire MUI through PMI privatisation than buying directly from the market. In fact, he's been aggressively buying MUI lately. H2O
Just checked, the last year report of MUIB (June 2011) has PMI as shareholder for 9.8%.
ReplyDeleteThere are also truckloads of MUIB ICULS (from the infamous PMCorp RPT), may be that explains it? Will check later again where the difference comes from.
Yes, there is borrowing, there is also a building and a piece of land.
PMI owns 9.83% of MUIB direct and 9.29% indirect, for a total of 19.12% according to MUIB's 2010 year report.
ReplyDelete