Showing posts with label Proton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proton. Show all posts

Monday, 27 November 2017

Insider trading, why the differences in punishment? (2)

I received the trading data of APLI during the time the insider trading.




Three snippets from the article on the SC website:

  • Thai was convicted for communicating non-public information between 26 October 2007 and 29 October 2007 to Tiong
  • APLI made announcements to Bursa Malaysia Securities Bhd about the audit adjustments and its classification as a PN 17 company on 31 October 2007
  • Tiong was convicted for two counts of disposing a total of 6,208,500 APLI shares while in possession of the same non-public information

If the announcement was made on October 31 2007, then the share price would have been impacted on the following trading date, November 1, 2007.

The relevant closing prices of APLI on those days are:
  • October 26, 2007: RM 0.39
  • October 29, 2007: RM 0.40
  • November 1, 2007: RM 0.31

So if Tiong sold 6,208,500 on October 26 and/or October 29 instead of November 1 (when the news was available to all parties), then the price difference is in the order of 6,208,500 times about RM 0.09, or about RM 560,000.

Compared to the sentences (5 years jail and RM 5 Million fine for Thai) that looks like a surprisingly small amount.

Just to put it in perspective, I suspected insider trading in Proton shares (see link) and wrote:


EPF sold about 15 million shares of Proton, for a price clearly below the MGO price. If the buyers of these shares were trading with insider information, then EPF was disadvantaged for an amount of roughly RM 20-30 million on those trades.


And that was just one party (EPF) possibly (hugely) disadvantaged in just one suspected insider trading case in Malaysia. I am pretty sure I can come up with dozens of similar suspicious insider trading cases, if not more.

According to this article in The Edge, Thai's lawyers "have advised that there are sufficient grounds to appeal on the conviction. As to the sentence, his lawyers have also filed an appeal on the grounds that it is manifestly excessive."

Friday, 11 January 2013

Protons marketshare slipped from 80% to 18%

Pretty astonishing statistics in an article from The Malaysian Insider:

"At its peak, four of every five cars sold in Malaysia was a Proton, but the carmaker is now in danger of slipping into third spot in sales behind Toyota and Perodua, the second national car company that has ruled the roost for over six years.

Industry sources told The Edge newspaper in an article published today that Proton saw its market share slip in December 2012 to just 17.7 per cent, with Toyota now a close third at 17.1 per cent share of passenger vehicle sales in the country.

“Perodua (Perusahaan Otomobil Kedua Sdn Bhd) is the runway market leader while Proton over the last few years has been a strong second. Now Toyota is closing in on Proton’s position,” an unnamed executive told the financial daily.

Proton is controlled by Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary’s DRB-Hicom.

Proton was established by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in 1983 and became a poster child of the former prime minister’s industrialisation policies.

Dr Mahathir had made it patriotic to buy a Proton, but the company has seen its sales slump in the last decade due to increasing liberalisation of the Malaysian market."


I wrote before about my home country, The Netherlands. Dutch people seem to be more practical then Malaysians, at least when things don't work out: just move on, even if it means taking a loss.

The Netherlands has a company dealing with cars, trucks etc, DAF, but in 1975 it sold of its passenger car division to Volvo in 1975. Dutch people had the same love-hate relationship with its (only) homegrown car as Malaysian have with Protons. The DAF passenger car was as ugly as the Proton Saga.




Holland also had one steel company, Hoogovens, it first merged with British Steel and was later sold to Tata Steel from India. Malaysia is still stuck with its steel industry, Perwaja Steel is rumored to have lost about RM 10 Billion.

KLM, the royal Dutch airlines, merged in 2004 with the much larger Air France. Malaysia Airlines continues to be a big headache, with huge accumulated losses of around RM 8 Billion.

For the people in charge, there might be a lesson here.

Sunday, 12 February 2012

Proton: possible Insider Trading, was EPF one of the victims?

Te recap: on January 16, 2012 DRB-Hicom announced that it would buy the shares of Proton from Khazanah Nasional for RM 5.50 per share and that it would make a Mandatory General Offer for all other shares. But up to that date, the share price of Proton had increased by about 100% in high volume since the first half of November 2011, giving rise to suspicion of insider trading, possibly in a large scale.




The chain of events (official announcements to Bursa Malaysia in red):

14-11-2011 Protons shares are thinly traded around RM 2,70 per share, in low volume of about 300,000 per day, as was normal for the preceding two months.

15-11-2011 The share price takes off, it closes at RM 3.21 in brisk volume of 4,300,000, more than ten times higher than the average volume in the previous days.

The trading volume in Proton shares will stay very high in the coming 12 trading days, averaging 4,400,000 shares.

17-11-2011 Article in The Star: "Research analysts and stockbrokers are surprised by the sudden surge in Proton's share price. They say the marketplace is abuzz with all sorts of rumours.".

3-12-2011 Article in The Star: "Speculations that Proton Holdings Bhd is once again a subject of a takeover or a management buyout persisted as the share price of the national auto maker spiked on Friday, rising to a nine-month high at 51 sen to RM3.61 a share."

5-12-2011 The volume has increased to more than 20 million (60 times its normal volume in the first half of November 2011), the price jumped further up from RM 3.82 to RM 4.50.

Bursa Malaysia finally issues an "UMA" (Unusual Market Activity) enquiry, three weeks after the share price took off in unusual high volume. This day represents the vertical line in the above graph.

6-12-2011 Proton announces: "The Board of Directors of PROTON wishes to clarify that after making due enquiry with the Board of Directors and major shareholders, the Company is not aware of any reason for the unusual market activity in the shares of the Company recently, and further, that there is no material corporate development not previously disclosed.". Khazanah Nasional is a major shareholder of Proton.

The article in The Star of that day: "Euphoria is in the air for Proton Holdings Bhd as its share price put on 89 sen or 24.6% to close at RM4.50, amidst talk that its largest shareholder, Khazanah Nasional Bhd, is divesting its stake in the national carmaker. A weekly reported that Khazanah was likely to ask for business proposals from parties interested in its 42.7% stake in Proton.".

8-12-2011 DRB-Hicom announces: "We refer to Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad’s (“Bursa Malaysia”) telephone query on Thursday, 8 December 2011 regarding the above article appearing in page 1 of Starbiz section, The Star newspaper dated 8 December 2011. In this regard, we wish to inform Bursa Malaysia that the Company is not aware of the source and the basis of the article."

The article in The Star: "DRB-HICOM Bhd's bid for control over Proton Holdings Bhd is likely to include the presence of Volkswagen AG at a later stage, a reliable source said. DRB-HICOM's plan is to first secure a controlling block in Proton. But at a later stage or second phase of the deal, DRB would divest some of its equity to Volkswagen, resulting in both parties sharing control and management in Proton, the source said. Such a structure could make the deal more desirable, considering that it moved away from the prospects of Proton falling into the hands of a foreign party, an issue which was likely to have been part of the reasons why previous attempts by Volkswagen to buy into Proton were scuttled."

12-12-2011 Article in The Star: "Proton adviser Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said that Khazanah was selling because it was not pumping more money into Proton, which needed funds for research and development work on new products such as hybrid cars. “I worry about the buyer (DRB-HICOM) having enough money to inject into Proton. The shares it will be buying are above market price, which will make profitability difficult,” Dr Mahathir said after delivering a speech at the MIDF Investment Forum organised by MIDF Amanah Investment Bank Bhd".

13-12-2011 Announcement by Proton: "The Board of Directors of Proton Holdings Berhad wishes to inform that after making due enquiry with the Major Shareholder, Khazanah Nasional Berhad ("Khazanah") has informed that, in its normal course of business, it regularly receives proposals, enquiries and expressions of interest in relation to its various investments and companies where it has interest in, including Proton.  Khazanah will make necessary disclosure at the appropriate time."

Article in The Star: The time has come for Khazanah Nasional Bhd to state its intentions about its 42.7% stake in Proton Holdings Bhd. With so much speculation on Khazanah's possible divestment plans, it would only do Khazanah and the market good if it said something more than the usual “We don't comment on speculation”.

28-12-2011 Article in The Star: "Persistent rumours about a possible takeover had resulted in spikes in Proton's share price in recent weeks. Among the names linked to the takeover included local automotive assembler DRB-HICOM Bhd, the Naza group (the country's largest privately held automotive group), Sime Darby Bhd and UMW Holdings Bhd.".

31-12-2011 Article in The Star "Should Proton Holdings Bhd go to DRB-HICOM Bhd?"

5-1-2011 The volume increases further to 9,500,000 shares, the share price closes above RM 5.00.

6-1-2011 Article in The Star: "The share price of Proton Holdings Bhd jumped to an intra-day four-year high of RM5.16 as talk and speculation on state fund Khazanah Nasional's 42.7% stake sale in the national carmaker intensify..... Industry observers said DRB-HICOM seemed to be the front-runner in the fight for the stake".

9-1-2011 The volume is 8,700,000 shares.

DRB-Hicom announces regarding the article "Bid for Proton Stake": "We refer to Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad’s (‘Bursa Malaysia”) telephone query on 9 January, 2012 regarding the above article appearing in the various newspapers dated 9 January 2012. We wish to inform Bursa Malaysia that DRB-HICOM has always viewed Proton Holdings Berhad (“Proton”) as an important automotive industry player and accordingly DRB-HICOM was on the look-out for when opportunity will arise to explore any viable proposal(s) which will benefit and add value to the Group’s business and expansion plans. In this regard, the Company has submitted a bid for the acquisition of Proton’s shares held by Khazanah Nasional Berhad (“Khazanah”). As at to date, the proposal is pending decision by Khazanah.".

12-1-2011 15.9 million shares are traded between RM 5.34 and 5.49

13-1-2011 11.8 million shares are traded between RM 5.18 and 5.53

16-1-2011 Proton shares are suspended and the announcement is made that DRB-Hicom will buy over the shares for RM 5.50.


The above chain of events make a bad overall impression. It looks very much that certain parties where privy of inside information.

Why was Bursa Malaysia so late with its Unusual Market Activity query? The share price of Proton had increased already over 3 consecutive weeks by a whopping 70% while the daily turnover had risen 20-fold when it finally took action.

The announcement on December 6, 2011 by Proton looks puzzling to say the least. The market was rife with rumour, but Proton nor Khazanah Nasional wasn't aware of anything at all?

The fact that the share price was more or less capped on RM 5.50 on the days before the final announcement on January 16, 2011, do suggest that certain parties might have known the price that DRB-Hicom would offer.

Also, both Proton and DRB-Hicom appeared remarkably passive in issuing announcements, both only responded on queries from Bursa Malaysia (most notably on December 6, 8 and 13, 2011 and January 9, 2012) from Bursa Malaysia, they didn't initiate these announcements themselves.

From Bursa Malaysia's website: "We place significant emphasis on timeliness, adequacy and accuracy of disclosure to enable investors to make informed investment decisions.". Was that really the case in the above corporate exercise? I have strong doubts about that.

Who are the victims of the possible insider trading? Everyone who sold his shares between November 15, 2011 and January 16, 2012. EPF is definitely one of them:

Disposed 16/11/2011  500,000 
Disposed 17/11/2011  50,000
Disposed 24/11/2011  4,392,300 
Disposed 30/11/2011  2,714,000 
Disposed 30/11/2011  2,000,000 
Disposed 02/12/2011  1,000,000
Disposed 02/12/2011  1,000,000 
Disposed 02/12/2011  1,000,000
Disposed 05/12/2011  441,300 
Disposed 05/12/2011  1,000,000 
Disposed 06/12/2011  100,000 
Disposed 06/12/2011  577,800 
Disposed 16/12/2011  60,000

EPF sold about 15 million shares of Proton, for a price clearly below the MGO price. If the buyers of these shares were trading with insider information, then EPF was disadvantaged for an amount of roughly RM 20-30 million on those trades.

Will EPF take any action? Until now, they have always been as quiet as a mouse, so I would not count on it.

Previous posts about this issue:

http://cgmalaysia.blogspot.com/search/label/Proton

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

Proton acquired by DRB-HICOM

Proton issued yesterday the following announcement:

http://announcements.bursamalaysia.com/EDMS/edmsweb.nsf/LsvAllByID/E581A6FBAFD248FD48257987003BD713?OpenDocument

(i) PROPOSED ACQUISITION BY DRB-HICOM BERHAD ("DRB-HICOM") OF 234,734,693 ORDINARY SHARES OF RM1.00 EACH IN PROTON HOLDINGS BERHAD ("PROTON") ("PROTON SHARES") REPRESENTING APPROXIMATELY 42.74% OF THE ISSUED AND PAID UP SHARE CAPITAL OF PROTON FROM KHAZANAH NASIONAL BERHAD FOR A TOTAL CASH CONSIDERATION OF RM1,291,040,812 OR RM5.50 PER PROTON SHARE ("PROPOSED ACQUISITION"); AND

(ii) PROPOSED MANDATORY GENERAL OFFER ("MGO") FOR ALL THE REMAINING PROTON SHARES NOT ALREADY OWNED BY DRB-HICOM AFTER THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION ("REMAINING PROTON SHARES") FOR A CASH CONSIDERATION OF RM5.50 PER PROTON SHARE ("PROPOSED MGO")

It is good news that there will be a Mandatory General Offer, which is normal in these cases.

But there is still the issue of possible insider trading:

http://cgmalaysia.blogspot.com/2011/12/proton-possible-insider-trading.html

After a huge run up (which started already in November 2011) in the share price, the following announcement was made on December 6, 2011:

"The Board of Directors of PROTON wishes to clarify that after making due enquiry with the Board of Directors and major shareholders, the Company is not aware of any reason for the unusual market activity in the shares of the Company recently, and further, that there is no material corporate development not previously disclosed. The focus of Management is to improve the performance of the Company and business is as usual."

In light of what has happened, authorities really should look into this matter.

Wednesday, 14 December 2011

Proton, possible insider trading?


The share price of Proton went hugely up especially in the middle of November and the first days of December. So much that on December 6, 2011 the trading of the shares was halted:

"Kindly be advised that trading in the above Company's securities has been halted with effect from 10.20 a.m., Tuesday, 6 December 2011. Trading in the securities will resume with effect from 11.20 a.m., Tuesday, 6 December 2011."

The company made the following standard announcement, regarding unusual market activity:

"We refer to Bursa Malaysia's telephone query on Monday, 5 December 2011 on unusual market activity in relation to PROTON's shares and the Article entitled "Khazanah to invite bids for PROTON" appearing on page 10 of the Edge (week of 5 December 2011 - 11 December 2011).

The Board of Directors of PROTON wishes to clarify that after making due enquiry with the Board of Directors and major shareholders, the Company is not aware of any reason for the unusual market activity in the shares of the Company recently, and further, that there is no material corporate development not previously disclosed. The focus of Management is to improve the performance of the Company and business is as usual.

The Company hereby undertakes to make all necessary disclosures to Bursa Malaysia in accordance with the provisions of the Main Market Listing Requirements."



But on December 12, 2011 newspaper articles appeared in The Star and New Straits Times



And Proton made the following announcement:

"Reference is drawn to the following Articles appearing in the newspapers on Monday, 12 December 2011:

1. "DRB-Hicom to buy into Proton" appearing on Page 6 of the New Straits Times; and
2. "Khazanah selling Proton stake to DRB-HICOM" appearing on Page 1 (Star Biz), of The Star.

The Board of Directors of PROTON Holdings Berhad wishes to inform that after making due enquiry with the Major Shareholder, Khazanah Nasional Berhad ("Khazanah") has informed that, in its normal course of business, it regularly receives proposals, enquiries and expressions of interest in relation to its various investments and companies where it has interest in, including PROTON. Khazanah will make necessary disclosure at the appropriate time.

We wish to reiterate that in the meantime, business is as usual at PROTON and the Company once again undertakes to make all necessary disclosure to Bursa Malaysia in accordance with the provisions of the Main Market Listing Requirements."

The text is clearly different from the announcement on December 6, 2011.

Another article from Business Times:

http://www.btimes.com.my/Current_News/BTIMES/articles/drbp-2/Article/

It will be interesting to follow this case. If indeed there will be a corporate development around Proton, then the possibility of insider trading looks real. And the authorities are still busy with the MAS/AirAsia insider trading case.