Good: "The six-hour meeting started with minority shareholders taking the chance to grill E&O managing director Datuk Terry Tham Ka Hon on his share sale with Sime Darby Bhd."
Bad: "Generally, many minority shareholders as well as MSWG were not satisfied with the replies given to the questions raised at the meeting"
Bad: "The media was not allowed to enter the meeting" (authorities really should try to do something about this, either by changing the rules or putting more pressure on companies to allow the press to attend AGM's or EGM's)
Strange: "why ECM Libra decided to seek representation on the board" (only holding 6.4% of the shares)
Strange: "Sime Darby has not nominated any representation to the board" (holding 30% of the shares)
Disappointing: the long time that the Securities Commission needs for its decisions (but these are tough decisions and I am hoping for not only good and fair decisions but also the reasoning behind them for future cases)
Disappointing: that the big players in this saga hardly ever mention the rights or the plight of the Minority Shareholders, the mentality Anno 2011 is scary to say the least. There are luckily many companies in Malaysia with a better attitude, the way the Board of Directors of SP Setia reacted on PNB's offer is just one example.
The Saga continues .....
http://www.btimes.com.my/Current_News/BTIMES/articles/EOREJ-2/Article/index_html
For those interesting AGMs, they can get proxy from other shareholders to attend the meeting or maybe buy 100 shares to attend the meeting... Transaction cost to buy and sell the 100 shares later is less than RM 30
ReplyDeleteExactly. But others also can facilitate, MSWG can ask shareholders who can not attend to give them the proxies, each shareholder can have 2 proxies. Government funds also can help. David Webb used to organize this in Hong Kong, he asked which shareholders would not attend and give their places to journalists.
ReplyDeleteI cannot fathom why the SC is taking such an inordinately long time to come out with their decision. At least they should set a deadline as to when they will give a ruling.
ReplyDeleteAvatar, I agree, but it is a difficult and big case, and many are watching it.
ReplyDeleteI think they might want to decide about all aspects in one decision (MGO for all shareholders, insider trading). The MGO is the most urgent and can actually be separated from the insider trading. But may be I am wrong, it is difficult, let's wait for the decision.
Strange: "Sime Darby has not nominated any representation to the board" (holding 30% of the shares)
ReplyDeleteOne of the criterias that determines whether there is MGO or not is change of control in the company. Other being premium paid and party acting in concert
If Sime brings in new Board member now, it will increase the lokelihood of MGO. I guess they will do so only after the issue on MGO has settled down.
Yes, you are probably right, games are being played.
ReplyDeleteBut I don't like it, it should not matter if Sime Darby will announce its directors now or later on.
Neither do I like vague statements from Sime Darby like "may be a MGO for all shareholders in a later stage". That is hardly an assurance for the minorities, they want to know for sure: when and at what price.